Pre-Grant Publication Number: 20070130448
Please help the USPTO examine the application by evaluating the relevance of the publicly submitted prior art to the patent application.
Peer To Patent forwards the Top 10 most relevant prior art submissions and their annotations to the USPTO.
Review this prior art and click on the thumbs up (or down) to indicate whether this submission should be forwarded to the USPTO.
If you login then you can add an annotation by typing in the box at the bottom of the screen to comment on the relevance of the prior art to the claims of the patent application.
Review this prior art and click on the thumbs up (or down) to indicate whether this submission should be forwarded to the USPTO.
If you login then you can add an annotation by typing in the box at the bottom of the screen to comment on the relevance of the prior art to the claims of the patent application.
Prior Art Detail
Summary / Description
| Summary / Description | Describes a method of virtually executing instructions. If virtual execution changes the internal state (registers) of the computer, then the instruction must be actually executed, else the instuction can be deleted. |
Basic Information
| Type of Prior Art | Issued Patents - US |
| Country | United States of America |
| Patent/Application # | 5644769 |
| Kind Code | United States (US) - United STATES Patent - A |
| Patentee Name | Matsutshita Electrical Industrial Co., Ltd. |
| Relevant Pages, Columns, or Lines | pp. 7-9; claim 1 |
| URL | |
| Filing Date | August 19, 1996 |
| Additional Information | |
Notes / To Do
| Notes | |
Excerpt
Excerpt Starting line 60, Col.2: "According to the above basic construction, for each instruction of the program, the internal state of the computer which is settled by the virtual execution of the instruction is extracted and stored. If the settled internal state is identical with at least a part of that for a prior instruction, namely if the instruction substantially overlaps a prior instruction, the instruction is judged to be an unnecessary instruction." |
Relevance
Claims
22
Relevance
Appears this claim 22 is broad in that it describes a unit performing computing logic.
Appears this claim 22 is broad in that it describes a unit performing computing logic.
Claim Chart
All
0 days left
