Pre-Grant Publication Number: 20080077604
Please help the USPTO examine the application by evaluating the relevance of the publicly submitted prior art to the patent application.
Peer To Patent forwards the Top 10 most relevant prior art submissions and their annotations to the USPTO.
Review this prior art and click on the thumbs up (or down) to indicate whether this submission should be forwarded to the USPTO.
If you login then you can add an annotation by typing in the box at the bottom of the screen to comment on the relevance of the prior art to the claims of the patent application.
Review this prior art and click on the thumbs up (or down) to indicate whether this submission should be forwarded to the USPTO.
If you login then you can add an annotation by typing in the box at the bottom of the screen to comment on the relevance of the prior art to the claims of the patent application.
Prior Art Detail
Summary / Description
| Summary / Description | Journal article describing a system to anonymize or "scrub" medical records. It does not claim to contribute anonymization, only to provide an improved and automated system for doing so. |
Basic Information
| Type of Prior Art | Print Publication |
| Publication Title * | Proceedings, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association |
| Author | Latanya Sweeney |
| ISBN | |
| Page Range | 333-337 |
| Medium | Journal article |
| Publication Date * | 1996 |
| URL | http://privacy.cs.cmu.edu/peopl... |
Notes / To Do
| Notes | Citations I found list only the year; apparently was presented at a conference called "AMIA 1996" and published in the related proceedings. |
Excerpt
Excerpt We define a new approach to locating and
replacing personally-identifying information in
medical records that extends beyond straight search-and-replace procedures, and we provide techniques
for minimizing risk to patient confidentiality. The
straightforward approach of global search and
replace properly located no more than 30-60% of all
personally-identifying information that appeared
explicitly in our sample database. On the other hand, our Scrub system found 99-100% of these references. Scrub uses detection algorithms that employ templates and specialized knowledge of what
constitutes a name, address, phone number and so
forth. |
Relevance
Claims
1
Relevance
After avoiding obfuscation of terms ("medical object" means "patient"), and allowing "at least one standard character" to refer to some general replacement string (since the application does not clearly define its limit, only offers certain examples of what it might be), I believe that the independent claims here are entirely anticipated by this example of prior art.
After avoiding obfuscation of terms ("medical object" means "patient"), and allowing "at least one standard character" to refer to some general replacement string (since the application does not clearly define its limit, only offers certain examples of what it might be), I believe that the independent claims here are entirely anticipated by this example of prior art.
Claim Chart
All
11
Relevance
After avoiding obfuscation of terms ("medical object" means "patient"), and allowing "at least one standard character" to refer to some general replacement string (since the application does not clearly define its limit, only offers certain examples of what it might be), I believe that the independent claims here are entirely anticipated by this example of prior art.
After avoiding obfuscation of terms ("medical object" means "patient"), and allowing "at least one standard character" to refer to some general replacement string (since the application does not clearly define its limit, only offers certain examples of what it might be), I believe that the independent claims here are entirely anticipated by this example of prior art.
Claim Chart
All
19
Relevance
After avoiding obfuscation of terms ("medical object" means "patient"), and allowing "at least one standard character" to refer to some general replacement string (since the application does not clearly define its limit, only offers certain examples of what it might be), I believe that the independent claims here are entirely anticipated by this example of prior art. With regard to claim 19 specifically, the "Scrub" paper describes a computer program product.
After avoiding obfuscation of terms ("medical object" means "patient"), and allowing "at least one standard character" to refer to some general replacement string (since the application does not clearly define its limit, only offers certain examples of what it might be), I believe that the independent claims here are entirely anticipated by this example of prior art. With regard to claim 19 specifically, the "Scrub" paper describes a computer program product.
Claim Chart
All
