Prior Artist Awards

These reviewers submitted prior art that was used in a USPTO office action.

Alberto Araiza
Claude Baudoin
Ankush Bedi
Rob Cameron
Jimmy Chen
Jason DeVeau Rosen
Walter Dietrich
Alexandre Eichenberger
Gabe Gomez
Conrad Herrmann
Christopher Ilardi
Thomas Irizarry
Durga Kandasamy
Peter Klett
Sharat Mendu
Paul Merolla
John Moore
Jeff Morrill
Susan Murray
Timothy Myers
Bindu Nair
Van Nguy
Mark Nowotarski
Ryan O’Quinn
William Pagan
Steve Pearson
Charles Peck
Abhay Porwal
Rishi Rawat
Adam Roach
Christian Seifert
Helen Shi
Ian Shields
Eun Sol Cho
Sujith Subramanian
Haritha Tapa
Yeen Tham
Henning Thienemann
Kathy Wang
Mark Webbink
Kent Williams
Amanda Willis Diane Willis

Thank you for sharing your knowledge!

 

 

Diane Willis

Reviewer: Diane Willis
Professional Association: Software Developer
Total Applications Reviewed:
Total Prior Art Submissions: 195
Total Prior Art Annotations: 5
Total Discussion Postings: 61

Submission: Apparatus and method for supporting execution of prefetch threads
Application:
Temporally Relevant Data Placement
Application Number: 11/588585
Publication Number: 20080104325
Publication Date: 5-1-2008
Inventor Name: Charles Narad
Assignee: Intel

Use in the USPTO Office Action:

“Claims 7,8, 11, 12, 17, 18 and 23 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Chiou et al. (US 6,370,622) and further in view of Colavin et al. (US 2006/0224860).”

“Claims 20 and 21 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Chiou et al. (US 6,370,622) and Applicant’s Admitted Art (APA) as applied to claim 19 above and further in view of Colavin et al. (US 2006/0224860).

Submission: US Patent 7421647: Gesture-based method and system
Application: Methods and systems for creation of hanging protocols using graffiti-enabled devices
Application Number: 11562804
Publication Number: 20080120576
Publication Date: 5-22-2008
Inventor Name: Murali Kumanran Kariathungal
Assignee: GE

Use in the USPTO Office Action:

12-22-2008 (non-final). 5-26-2009 (final) “Claims 8-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Squilla et al., Publication Number: 2008/0103828, hereinafter Squilla, Zhang etal., Publication Number: 2007/0274585, hereinafter Zhang, and Reiner, Patent Number: 7,421,647.”

Submission: Improving Health Care by Understanding Patient Preferences
Application: Systems and Method for Managing Patient Preference Data
Application Number: 11735818
Publication Number: 20080255875
Publication Date: 10-16-2008
Inventor Name: Pallav Sharda
Assignee: GE

Use in the USPTO Office Action:

4-3-2009 (non-final) “Claims 1-8, 10, 12-20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(b) as being anticipated by Brennan (Improving Health Care by Understanding Patient Preferences: The Role of Computer Technology).”

9-21-2009 (final) “Claims 1-5, 7-8, 10, 12, 15-18 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(b) as being anticipated by Brennan (Improving Health Care by Understanding Patient Preferences: The Role of Computer Technology).”

4-1-2010 (non-final) and 9-14-2010 (final). “Claim(s) 16-17 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Ruland in view of Mcllroy, as applied to parent claim 1 above, and further inview of Brennan (Improving Health Care by Understanding Patient Preferences: The Role of Computer Technology).”

Submission: Diagnosing Intermittent Faults in Telecommunication Networks
Application: Diagnosing Intermittent Faults
Application Number: 11940493
Publication Number: 20080294578
Publication Date: 11/27/2008
Inventor Name: Johan de Kleer
Assignee: Palo Alto Research Center

Use in the USPTO Office Action:

11-4-2009 (Non-Final)- “Claims 1 and 15 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(b) as being anticipated by Blom et al (Diagnosing Intermittent Faults in Telecommunications Networks).

“Claims 2 and 16 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Blom et al (Diagnosing Intermittent Faults in Telecommunication Networks).”

“Claims 3, 5-7, 17, 19-21 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Blom in view of Contant et al (Failure Diagnosis of Discrete Event Systems: The Case of Intermittent Faults).”

5-11-2010 (Final)- “Claims 1, 15, 22 and 23 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(b) as being anticipated by Blom et al (Diagnosing Intermittent Faults in Telecommunications Networks).”

“Claims 3, 5-7, 17, 19-21 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Blom in view of Contant et al (Failure Diagnosis of Discrete Event Systems: The Case of Intermittent Faults).”

“Claims 2 and 16 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Blom et al (Diagnosing Intermittent Faults in Telecommunication Networks).

10-18-2010 (non-final)- “Claims 3, 5-7, 17, 19-21 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Blom in view of Contant et al (Failure Diagnosis of Discrete Event Systems: The Case of Intermittent Faults).”

10-18-2010 (Non-Final)- “Claims 1, 15, and 23 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(b) as being anticipated by Blom et al (Diagnosing Intermittent Faults in Telecommunication Networks).

Claims 2 and 16 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Blom et al (Diagnosing Intermittent Faults in Telecommunication Networks).”

“Claims 3, 5-7, 17, and 19 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Blom in view of Contant et al (Failure Diagnosis of Discrete Event Systems: The Case of Intermittent Faults).”

Submission: Method and system for automatically generating questions and receiving customer feedback for each transaction
Application: Education System to improve online reputation
Application Number: 11848727
Publication Number: 20090063248
Publication Date: 3-5-2009
Inventor Name: Jerry T. Chong
Assignee: Ebay, Inc

Use in the USPTO Office Action:

9-4-2009 (Final)- “Claims 13, 24 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Lee (US 2005/0114379 A1) in view of Szlam et al. (US 2004/0111310 A1) as applied to Claim 1, further in view of Falk et al. (US 2001/0037206 A1).

3-18-2010 (Final)- “Claims 13, 24 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Hurwitz (US 6,856,963 B1) in view of Szlam et al. (US 2004/0111310 A1) , Stith (US 2006/0229933 A1) and Aspe et al. (US 6,974,328 B2) as applied to Claim 1, further in view of et al. (US 2001/0037206 A1).

10-28-2010 (Non-Final)- “Claims 13, 24 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Hurwitz (US 6,856,963 B1) in view of Szlam et al. (US 2004/0111310 A1) , Stith (US 2006/0229933 A1) and Aspe et al. (US 6,974,328 B2) as applied to Claim 1, further in view of et al. (US 2001/0037206 A1).

5-12-2011 (Final)- “Claims 13, 24 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Hurwitz (US 6,856,963 B1) in view of Szlam et al. (US 2004/0111310 A1), Stith (US 2006/0229933 A1) and Aspe et al. (US 6,974,328 B2) as applied to Claim 1, further in view of et al. (US 2001/0037206 A1).”

Submission: EPS- Extended Pharmacy Services
Application: Medication identifying and organizing systems
Application Number: 11998214
Publication Number: 20090144087
Publication Date: 6-4-2009
Inventor Name: Michael Anthony Kelsch
Assignee: Pro Se Kelsch

Use in the USPTO Office Action:

12-1-2009 (non-final)- “Claims 1-3 and 5 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Gomez (US PGPUB 2006/0253346 A1) and in further view of Williams et al. (US PGPUB 2008/0040602 A1) and in further view of “EPS- Extended Pharmacy Services- A Telepharmacy Solution Practice Model”, 2007 (EPS).

4-1-2010 (final)- “Claim 4 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Gomez (US PGPUB 2006/0253346 A1) and in further view of Williams et al. (US PGPUB 2008/0040602 A1) and in further view of “EPS- Extended Pharmacy Services- A Telepharmacy Solution Practice Model”, 2007 (EPS).

Submission: US 2020012911 Filtering unsolicited email Application: System and method for unsolicited electronic mail identification and evasion
Application Number: 11948649
Publication Number:
20090144374
Publication Date:
6-4-2009
Inventor Name:
Gant Laborde
Assignee:
Pro Se Laborde

Use in the USPTO Office Action:

11-27-2009 (Non-Final)- “Claims 1-3 and 11-12 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(b) as being anticipated by Cooper US Publication Number (20020129111).

“Claims 4-10 and 13-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Cooper et al USPN (20020129111) in view of Sutidze et al USPN (20070180039), hereinafter “Sutidze”.

 
Submission: Method and apparatus for pausing a send queue without causing sympathy errors
Application: Network interface device with memory management capabilities
Application Number: 12/430,912
Publication Number: 20100274876
Publication Date: October 28, 2010
Inventor Name: Michael Kagan
Assignee: Institute for Medicinal Biotechnology, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences
 
Use in USPTO Office Action:

June 15, 2011 (Non-Final Rejection). “Claims 1, 3-8, 11, and 13-18 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(b) as being anticipated by Neal et al. (U.S. Patent 6,766,467).”

“Claims 2, 9, 10, 12, 19, and 20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Neal et al. (U.S. Patent 6,766,467) and Krause et al. (U.S. Patent 7.171,484).”

November 2, 2011 (Non-Final Rejection). “Claims 1-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Neal et al. (U.S. Patent 6,766,467) and Krause et al. (U.S. Patent 7,171,484).

Submission: US 7,702,401 System for Preserving and Displaying Process Control Data Associated with an Abnormal Situation
Application: Controller
Application Number: 12/712,920
Publication Number: 20110026407
Publication Date: 2/3/11
Inventor Name: Hiroaki Yamada
Assignee: Omron Corporation
Use in USPTO Office Action:

Sept. 30, 2011 (Non-Final Rejection): “Claims 1-4 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(e) as being anticipated by Eryurek, US 7,702,401.

Submission: Process for rewriting executable content on a network server or desktop machine in order to enforce site specific properties
Application: Method and apparatus for modifying an executable application using in-memory object representation
Application Number: 12/509,328
Publication Number: 20110023014
Publication Date: January 27, 2011
Inventor Name: Jeffrey Todd Harper
Assignee: CYMI Technologies, LLC
Use in USPTO Office Action:

August 30, 2011 (Non-Final Rejection). “Claim 1 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(b) as being anticipated by US 6,865,735 to Sirer et al. (hereafter Sirer).”

“Claims 2-10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Sirer in view of Brandyberry.”

Submission: US 5671403 Iterative Dynamic Programming System for Query Optimization with Bounded Complexity
Application: System and Method for Processing Database Queries
Application Number: 12/757,639
Publication Number: 20110035368
Publication Date: Feb. 10, 2011
Inventor Name: Richard L. Cole
Assignee: ParAccel, Inc.
Use in USPTO Office Action:

Aug. 29, 2011 (Non-Final Rejection): “Claims 1-14, 16-18, and 20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Shekita et al (US 5,671,403) in view of Liu et al (US 2005/0138047 A1).”

Aug. 29, 2011 (Non-Final Rejection): “Claims 15 and 19 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Shekita et al (US 5,671,403) in view of Liu et al (US 2005/0138047 AI) in further view of Liu et al (US 7,076,477).”

Steve Pearson

Steve Pearson

Reviewer: Steve Pearson
Professional Association: Senior Software Engineer, IBM
Total Applications Reviewed: 42
Total Prior Art Submissions: 15
Total Prior Art Annotations: 29
Total Discussion Postings: 69

Submission: Intel Active Management Technology Quick Reference (2005)
Application: User selectable management alert format
Application Number: 11/286554
Publication Number: 20070118658
Publication Date: May 24, 2007
Inventor Name: Paul Broyles, et al
Assignee: Hewlettt Packard
Use in USPTO Office Action: ”Claims 1-21 are rejected under 35 USC 103(a) as being unpatentable over [Intel Active Management Technology Quick Reference] in view of Govindarajan et al., US Patent Application Publication No. 2007/0011491 A1.”

Submission: Dynamic Feedback: An Effective Technique for Adaptive Computing (1997)
Application: Method and apparatus for selectively executing different executable code versions which are optimized in different ways
Application Number: 11/389579
Publication Number: 20070226722
Publication Date: September 27, 2007
Inventor Name: Yuan Chou
Assignee: Sun Microsystems Inc.
Use in USPTO Office Action:

“Claims 1, 3-4 and 7; 8, 10-11 and 14; 15, 17-18 and 21 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a) as being anticipated by Diniz et al., “Dynamic Feedback: An Effective Technique for Adaptive Computing.”

“Claims 2 and 5-6; 9 and 12-13; 16 and 19-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Diniz et al., “Dynamic Feedback: An Effective Technique for Adaptive Computing” in view of DeWitt, Jr. et al. (US 2005/0081107 A1).”

Submission: Power Management for clustered computing platforms
Application: Method of remotely controlling the power consumption of one or more servers
Application Number: 11/493046
Publication Number: 20080028242
Publication Date: 1-31-2008
Inventor Name: Darren Cepulis
Assignee: Hewlett Packard Inc.,

Use in the USPTO Office Action:

July 26, 2006 (Non-final). “Claims 1-3, 5, 8-10, 12, 15-16, 18, 20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(b) as being anticipated by “Zimmer”, US Publication 20040255171 [patent 7,051215]”

April 13, 2009 (Non-final). “Claims 1-9, 12-18, 20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over “Zimmer, US Publication 20040255171 [patent 7,051,215], in view of “RILOE” (Remote Insight Lights-Out Edition II User Guide Version 1.0).”

 
June 19, 2009 (Non-Final): Claims 1-9, 12-18, 20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over “Zimmer”, US Publication 20040255171, in view of “RILOE” (Remote Insight Lights-Out Edition II USER Guide Version 1.0).”

Oct 31, 2008 (Final). “Claims 1-9, 11-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over “Zimmer”, US Publication 20040255171 (patent 7,051,215), in view of “RILOE” (Remote Insight Lights-Out Edition II User Guide Version 1.0).

Submission: Multinode computer system with distributed clock synchronization system
Application: Technique to Modify a Timer

Application Number: 11/416647

Publication Number: 20070260907
Publication Date: 11/08/2007
Inventor Name: Martin Dixon
Assignee: Intel

Use in the USPTO Office Action:

Claims 1-3, and 17-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(b) as being clearly anticipated by Lovett et al. [hereinafter as Lovett], US Patent 6,591,370.”

Submission: System and Method for Efficient Large-Scale Data Processing

Application: General Distributed Reduction for Data Parallel Computing
Application Number: 12/406842
Publication Number: 20100241828
Publication Date: Sept. 23, 2010
Inventor Name: Yuan Yu
Assignee: Microsoft Corporation

Use in USPTO Office Action:

Sept. 8, 2011 (Non-Final): “Claims 1-6, 10-11, 14-16 and 19-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 1029e) as being anticipated by Dean et al. (US 7,650,331 B1).

Sept. 8, 2011 (Non-Final): “Claims 7-9, 12-13 and 17-18 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Dean et al. (US 7,650,331 B1) in view of Felty et al. (US 6,343,372 B1).

Application: System and method of conclusively verifying the correctness of an information system without needing to test every combination of behaviour at run-time
Application Number: 12/520,274
Publication Number: 20110022575
Publication Date: January 27, 2011
Inventor Name: Paul Leslie Tomkins
Assignee: Pro Se
Use in USPTO Office Action:

September 19, 2011 (Non-Final Rejection). “Claims 1-4 and 6 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over “Metadata for Business Rules Integration with Database Schema” by Butleris et al, hereinafter “Butleris”, and further in view of US Patent 6,263,498 to Alcorn et al, hereinafter ‘Alcorn’.”

“Claim 5 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over “Metadata for Business Rules Integration with Database Schema” by Butleris et al, hereinafter “Butleris”, and further in view of US Patent 6,263,498 to Alcorn et al, hereinafter ‘Alcorn’, as applied to claim 1 above, and further in view of US Patent 7,603,358 to Anderson et al, hereinafter ‘Anderson’.”

Susan Murray

Reviewer: Susan Murray
Professional Association: Counsel – IP Strategy and Policy
Total Applications Reviewed: 44
Total Prior Art Submissions: 38
Total Prior Art Annotations: 4
Total Discussion Postings: 22

Submission: “Intercreative Cinema: Collaborative Expression with Digital Video” (2001)
Application: Methods of enhancing media content narrative
Application Number: 11/687,721
Publication Number: 20070220583
Publication Date: September 20, 2007
Inventor Name: Bailey; Christopher A.; et al.
Assignee:
Use in USPTO Office Action:

“Claim 18 is rejected under 25 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Massey in view of Kitayama as applied to claim 17 further in view of Seo (published article, “Interactive Cinema”, published 2001 pages 1-107).”

(10/28/08, Final): “Claims 1, 2, 6, 14-16, 20-22, 24, 26, 27, 29-31, 35, 37-41 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Massey in view of Seo (published article, ‘Intercreative Cinema’ published 2001 pages 1-107) further in view of Boss and further in view of Kates.”

(10/28/08, Final): “Claims 3-5, 7, 8, 23, 33 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Massey in view of Seo further in view of Boss and further in view of Kates as applied to claim 1 and further in view of Fredlund et al (PUb. No. US 2004/0194123 A1; hereinafter Fredlund).

(10/28/08, Final): “Claims 9 and 11 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Massey in view of Seo further in view of Boss and further in view of Kates as applied to claim 1 and further in view of Kitayama (Pub. No. US 2003/0058866 A1; hereinafter Kitayama).”

Submission: Handheld Technology to Improve Patient Care
Application: Systems and Method for Managing Patient Preference Data
Application Number:
11/735818
Publication Number: 20080255875
Publication Date:
10-16-2008
Inventor Name:
Pallav Sharda
Assignee:
GE

Use in the USPTO Office Action:

4-1-2010 (non-final) “Claim(s) 1, 3-5, 7, 10-12, 18, 21, 23, 26-27 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Ruland (Handheld Technology to Improve Patient Care: Evaluating a Support System for Preference based Care Planning at the Bedside, mailed 4/3/2009) in view of Mcllroy (5583758).

9-14-2010 (final) “Claim(s) 1,3-5, 7, 11-12, 18, 27 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Ruland (Handheld Technology to Improve Patient Care: Evaluating a Support System for Preference based Care Planning at the Bedside, mailed 4/3/2009) in view of Mcllroy (5583758).

Submission: System and Method for Intake of a Patient in a Hospital Emergency
Application: Smart, secured remote patient registration workflow systems
Application Number:
11/768392
Publication Number: 20090006439
Publication Date:
1-1-2009
Inventor Name:
Hencil Peter Joseph
Assignee:
GE

Use in the USPTO Office Action:

9-11-2009- (nonfinal) “Claims 1, 4-11, 14-23, 25 and 26 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Cindy M. Lux (US 2004/0186744), hereinafter ‘Lux’, in view of Gorsev Pristine (US 2004/0138924)” 3-1-2010 (non-final)

“Claims 1, 4-5, 8-9, 14-23 and 26 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Cindy M. Lux (US 2004/0186744), hereinafter ‘Lux’, in view of Gorsev Pristine (US 2004/0138924), hereinafter ‘Pristine’ and Morgan et al (or hereinafter “Morgan”) (US6611708).”

8-18-2010 (Final) “Claims 1, 4-5, 8, 27 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Cindy M. Lux (US 2004/0186744), hereinafter ‘Lux’, in view of Gorsev Pristine (US 2004/0138924), hereinafter ‘Pristine’ and ‘Seto (US 7206727).

“Claims 9, 14-17, 19-23 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Cindy M. Lux (US 2004/0186744), hereinafter ‘Lux” in view of Gorsev Pristine (US 2004/0138924), hereinafter ‘Pristine’ and Griswold (US 20050262046).

“Claims 12, 13 and 24 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Lux in view of Pristine, and Griswold and further in view of Tushie et al. (US 2003/0050899), hereinafter ‘Tushie’.

“Claims 9-14-17, 19-23 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Cindy M. Lux (US 2004/0186744), hereinafter ‘Lux’, in view of Gorsev Pristine (US 2004/0138924), hereinafter ‘Pristine’, and Block et al (or hereinafter “Block”) (US 20090289105).

“Claims 28-29 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Cindy M. Lux (US 2004/0186744), hereinafter ‘Lux’, in view of Gorsev Pristine (US 2004/0138924), hereinafter ‘Pristine’,and Griswold (US 20050261046) and further in view of Morgan.

Submission: Specification for the Advanced Encryption Standard (AES) Application: Exclusive Encryption System Application Number:12/003557
Publication Number: 20090129585
Publication Date:
5-21-2009
Inventor Name:
James M Lewis
Assignee:
Pro Se

Use in the USPTO Office Action:

10-22-2009 (nonfinal) 10-22-2009 (non-final)- “Claims 1 and 11 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(b) as being anticipated by FIPS Publication 197- “Announcing the Advanced Encryption Standard (AES), FIPS Publication 197”, hereafter referred to as “FIPS-197”.

Submission: System and Method for Intake of a Patient in a Hospital Emergency
Application: Smart, secured remote patient registration workflow systems
Application Number:
11/768392
Publication Number: 20090006439
Publication Date:
1-1-2009
Inventor Name:
Hencil Peter Joseph
Assignee:
GE

Use in the USPTO Office Action:

9-11-2009 (nonfinal) “Claims 1, 4-11, 14-23, 25 and 26 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Cindy M. Lux (US 2004/0186744), hereinafter ‘Lux’, in view of Gorsev Pristine (US 2004/0138924)”

3-1-2010 (non-final) “Claims 1, 4-5, 8-9, 14-23 and 26 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Cindy M. Lux (US 2004/0186744), hereinafter ‘Lux’, in view of Gorsev Pristine (US 2004/0138924), hereinafter ‘Pristine’ and Morgan et al (or hereinafter “Morgan”) (US6611708).

8-18-2010 (final) “Claims 1, 4-5, 8, 27 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Cindy M. Lux (US 2004/0186744), hereinafter ‘Lux’, in view of Gorsev Pristine (US 2004/0138924), hereinafter ‘Pristine’ and ‘Seto (US 7206727).

“Claims 9, 14-17, 19-23 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Cindy M. Lux (US 2004/0186744), hereinafter ‘Lux” in view of Gorsev Pristine (US 2004/0138924), hereinafter ‘Pristine’ and Griswold (US 20050262046).

“Claims 12, 13 and 24 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Lux in view of Pristine, and Griswold and further in view of Tushie et al. (US 2003/0050899), hereinafter ‘Tushie’.

“Claims 9-14-17, 19-23 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Cindy M. Lux (US 2004/0186744), hereinafter ‘Lux’, in view of Gorsev Pristine (US 2004/0138924), hereinafter ‘Pristine’, and Block et al (or hereinafter “Block”) (US 20090289105).

“Claims 28-29 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Cindy M. Lux (US 2004/0186744), hereinafter ‘Lux’, in view of Gorsev Pristine (US 2004/0138924), hereinafter ‘Pristine’, and Griswold (US 20050261046) and further in view of Morgan.

 

Ryan O’Quinn

Reviewer: Ryan O’Quinn
Professional Association: Grad/Undergrad Student
Total Applications Reviewed: 34
Total Prior Art Submissions: 7
Total Prior Art Annotations: 0
Total Discussion Postings: 8
Submission: Synthesis and anticancer activity of geldanamycin derivatives derived from biosynthetically generated metabolites
Application: Set of geldanamycin derivatives and their preparation methods
Application Number: 12/812,817
Publication Number: 20100311694
Publication Date: December 30, 2010
Inventor Name: Zhuorong Li
Assignee: Institute for Medicinal Biotechnology, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences
Use in USPTO Office Action:

September 15, 2011 (Non-Final Rejection). “Claim 1 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(b) as being anticipated by Lee et al. (Org. Biomol. Chem., 2008,6, 340-348).”

Submission: The Study of Advanced Taxonomic and Conservation Techniques…
Application: Herbicide composition and weed control method
Application Number: 12/934969
Publication Number: 20110028332
Publication Date: February 3, 2011
Inventor Name: Keisuke Sekino
Assignee: SDS Biotech K.K.
Use in USPTO Office Action:

August 29, 2011 (Non-Final Rejection). “Claims 19-23, 25-29 and 32-34 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a) as being anticipated by Shinwari (Post-Doctoral Research Study Final Technical Report).”

Submission: GEL-FORM MOLDED RESIN COMPOSITION, PACKAGED VOLATILE GEL-FORM CHEMICAL, AND PROCESS FOR PRODUCING THE SAME
Application: Herbicide composition and weed control method
Application Number: 12/934969
Publication Number: 20110028332
Publication Date: February 3, 2011
Inventor Name: Keisuke Sekino
Assignee: SDS Biotech K.K.
Use in USPTO Office Action:

August 29, 2011 (Non-Final Rejection). “Claims 19-29 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(b) as being anticipated by Kataoka et al. (EP 1 142 959 A1).”

Submission: Method of initiating the premature replacement of a roll of material
Application: Systems and methods for feed control of rolled stock raw materials
Application Number: 12/462,618
Publication Number: 20110035041
Publication Date: February 2, 2011
Inventor Name: Stephen J. Habakus
Assignee: Pro Se
Use in USPTO Office Action:

October 5, 2011 (Non-Final Rejection). “Claims 1-26 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Ng et al. (US Pat. No. 4,631,682) in view of Juhe et al. (US Pat. No. 5,769,353).”

Mark Webbink

 
Reviewer: Mark Webbink
Professional Association: New York Law School, Executive Director of CPI
Total Applications Reviewed:
Total Prior Art Submissions: 31
Total Prior Art Annotations: 1
Total Discussion Postings: 5
Submission: Optimal Participation of a Microgrid to the Energy Market with an Intelligent EMS
Application: Hybrid Robust Predictive Optimization Method of Power System Dispatch
Application Number: 11/897,207
Publication Number: 20090062969
Publication Date: March, 5, 2009
Inventor Name: Ramu Sharat Chandra
Assignee: GE
Use in USPTO Office Action:

September 3, 2009 (Non-Final): “Claims 1-6, 8, 11-17, 19, 22-29, 31, and 34 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(b) as being anticipated by Celli, G., Pilo, F. Pisano, G., Soma, G.G. “Optimal Participation of a Microgrid to the Energy Market with an Intelligent EMS.” The 7th International Power Engineering Conference (2005): 1-6.”

December 30, 2009 (Final): “Claims 1-6, 8, 11-17, 19, 22-29, 31, and 34 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being anticipated by Celli, G., Pilo, F. Pisano, G., Soma, G.G. “Optimal Participation of a Microgrid to the Energy Market with an Intelligent EMS.” The 7th International Power Engineering Conference (2005): 1-6. (hereinafter referred to as Celli et al.) in view of Balan et al. US 2007/0100503).”

August 24, 2010 (Final): “ Claims 1-6, 8, 11-17, 19, and 22 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Celli, G., Pilo, F, Pisano, G., Soma, G.G. “Optimal Participation of a Microgrid to the Energy market with an Intelligent EMS.” The 7th International Power Engineering Conference (2005): 1-6 (hereinafter referred to as Celli et al.) in view of Balan et al. US 2007/0100503.”

November 24, 2010 (Non-Final): “Applicant’s arguments, see pages 7-8, filed 11/11/10, with respect to the rejections) of claim(s) 1-6, 8, 11-17, 19, 22-29, 31, and 34 under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Celli et al. nor Balan et al. teach the newly amended features of independent claims 1 and 12, i.e., “electric generator up-time and down-time constraints, thermal generator up-time and down-time constraints, and combined heat and power generator up-time and down-time constraints.”

Submission: Integration of Distributed Energy Resources: The CERTS MicroGrid Concept
Application: Hybrid Robust Predictive Optimization Method of Power System Dispatch
Application Number: 11/897,207
Publication Number: 20090062969
Publication Date: March, 5, 2009
Inventor Name: Ramu Sharat Chandra
Assignee: GE

Use in USPTO Office Action:

September 3, 2009 (Non-Final): “Claims 7, 9, 10, 18, 20, 21, 30, 32, and 33 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Celli et al. as applied to claims 1, 12, and 25 above, and further in view of “Energy Manager Design for Microgrids.” PIER Final Project Report, Consortium for Electric Reliability Technology Solutions, CEC-500-2005-051, July 2005 (provided by applicant).”

December 30, 2009 (Final): “Claims 7, 9, 10, 18, 20, and 21are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Celli et al. as applied to claims 1, 12, and 25 above, and further in view of “Energy Manager Design for Microgrids.” PIER Final Project Report, Consortium for Electric Reliability Technology Solutions, CEC-500-2005-051, July 2005 (provided by applicant).”

Submission: Method and Computer Network for Co-ordinating a Loan over the Internet
Application: Method and System for Loan Application Non-Acceptance Follow-up
Application Number: 11/856,785
Publication Number: 20090063329
Publication Date: March 5, 2009
Inventor Name: Raymond Gerber
Assignee: Purpose Intellectual Property Management II, Inc.
Use in USPTO Office Action:

August 19, 2010 (Final): “Claims 1-4 and 12-17 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over US Patent 6,611,816 to Lebda et al. (further referred to as Lebda), in view of US Pub 2008/0126244 A1 to Loving et al. (further referred to as Loving), and further in view of US Pub 2005/0055231 A1 to Lee (further referred to as Lee).”

Alexandre Eichenberger

Reviewer: Alexandre Eichenberger
Professional Association: IBM
Total Applications Reviewed: 1
Total Prior Art Submissions: 2
Total Prior Art Annotations: 0
Total Discussion Postings: 0

Submission: Data access and permute unit
Application: Method and apparatus for an inductive doubling architecture
Application Number: 11/834333
Publication Number: 20080046686
Publication Date: 2-21-2008
Inventor Name: Robert D Cameron
Assignee: International Characters

Use in the USPTO Office Action:

“Claims 1-5 are rejected under 35 U.S.C 102(e) as being taught by Knowles, U.S. Patent Application Publication 2006/0227966 (herein referred to as Knowles)”

Submission: A High-Performance SIMD Floating Point Unit for BlueGene/L:Architecture, Compilation, and Algorithm Design

Application: Method and Apparatus for an inductive doubling architecture

Application Number: 11834333
Publication Number: 20080046686
Publication Date: 2-21-2008
Inventor Name: Vincent Zimmer
Assignee: Intel

Use in the USPTO Office Action:

September 24, 2009 (Non-Final). ”Claims 1-16 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Knowles, U.S. Patent Application Publication 2006/0227966 (herein referred to as Knowles) in view of Sijstermans, U.S. Patent number 6,438,676 (herein referred to as Sijstermans)”.

Christopher Ilardi

Reviewer: Christopher Ilardi
Professional Association: Patent Professional/Searcher
Total Applications Reviewed: 66
Total Prior Art Submissions: 83
Total Prior Art Annotations: 0
Total Discussion Postings: 8
Submission: Methods and apparatus for user-based targeted content delivery
Application: Method and system for authoring multiple application versions based on audience qualifiers
Application Number: 12/873,198
Publication Number: 20110022637
Publication Date: January 27, 2011
Inventor Name: Aslam Khader
Assignee: CYMI Technologies, LLC
Use in USPTO Office Action:

September 16, 2011 (Non-Final Rejection). “Claims 1, 4-15 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(e) as being anticipated over Lajoie, (U.S. Patent Pub. No. 2009/0187939).”

“Claims 2-3 and 16-17 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being anticipated over Lajoie, (U.S. Patent Pub. No. 2009/0187939), in view of Bentley (U.S. Patent No. 7,165,076).”

Submission: Tuner input filter with electronically adjustable center frequency for adapting to antenna characteristic
Application: System and method of automatic tuning adjustment for portable radio frequency receivers
Application Number: 12/535,599
Publication Number: 20110034139
Publication Date: February 10, 2011
Inventor Name: Peiqi Xuan
Assignee: Quintic Holdings
Use in USPTO Office Action:

September 16, 2011 (Non-Final Rejection). “Claim 1, 5, 11, 15, 21-22 rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(b) as being anticipated by Hall US 2005/0162570 A1.”

“Claim 2-3, 8, 12-13, 18-20 rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Hall as applied to claim 1 above, and further in view of Tuttle US 7127217 B2.”

“Claim 4, 14 rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over the combination of Hall and Tuttle as applied to claim 2 above, and further in view of Aytur US 6013958.”

“Claim 6-7, 16-17 rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Hall as applied to claim 5 above, and further in view of Carroll US 6195579 B1.”

“Claim 9-10 rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Hall as applied to claim 5 above, and further in view of Somasundaram US 2008/0318577 A1.”

Submission: Power management system that changes processor level if processor utilization crosses threshold over a period that is different for switching up or down
Application: Methods of power management and apparatus thereof
Application Number: 12/662,106
Publication Number: 20100299545
Publication Date: November 25, 2010
Inventor Name: Young-Ki Liu
Assignee: Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
Use in USPTO Office Action:

November 29, 2011 (Non-Final Rejection):

“Claim 14 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(b) as being anticipated by Therien et al. U.S. Patent No. 2,017,060 (“Therien”).

“Claims 1-3, 6-8, 10-11, 13 are rejected under 35 U.S.C 103(a) as being unpatentable over Therien et al. U.S. Patent No. 7.017,060 (“Therien”) in view of Taha et al. US Pub. No. 20090049314 (“Taha”).

“Claims 15-16 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Therien as applied to claim 14 above, and further in view of Taha.”

Peter Klett

Reviewer: Peter Klett
Professional Association: IBM Research
Total Applications Reviewed: 1
Total Prior Art Submissions: 3
Total Prior Art Annotations: 0
Total Discussion Postings: 0
Submission: WO 2004(084034 A2) Patient Registration Dock
Application: Smart, Secured Remote Patient Registration Workflow Systems and Methods Using a Kiosk Model
Application Number: 11/768,392
Publication Number: 20090006439
Publication Date: Jan. 1, 2009
Inventor Name: Hencil Peter Joseph
Assignee: GE
Use in USPTO Office Action:

Submission: US 2004/0138924 System and Method for Intake of a Patient in a Hospital Emergency Room
Application: Smart, Secured Remote Patient Registration Workflow Systems and Methods Using a Kiosk Model
Application Number: 11/768,392
Publication Number: 20090006439
Publication Date: Jan. 1, 2009
Inventor Name: Hencil Peter Joseph
Assignee: GE
Use in USPTO Office Action:

(9/11/2009 – Non-Final): “Claims 1, 4-11, 14-23, 25 and 26 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Cindy M. Lux (US 2004/0186744), hereinafter ‘Lux,’ in view of Gorsev Pristine (US 2004/0138924), hereinafter ‘Pristine’.

(3/01/2010 – Non-Final): “Claims 1, 4-5, 8-9, 14-23 and 26 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Cindy M. Lux (US 2004/0186744), hereinafter ‘Lux,’ in view of Gorsev Pristine (US 2004/0186744), hereinafter ‘Pristine’ and Morgan et al (or hereinafter ‘Morgan’) (US 6611708).

(8/10/2010 – Final): “Claims 1, 4-5, 8, 27 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Cindy M. Lux (US 2004/0186744), hereinafter ‘Lux,’ in view of Gorsev Pristine (US 2004/0138924), hereinafter ‘Pristine’ and Seto (US 7206737).”

“Claims 9, 14-17, 19-23 are rejected under 35 U.S.C 103(a) as being unpatentable over Cindy M. Lux (US 2004/0186744), hereinafter ‘Lux,’ in view of Gorsev Pristine (US 2004/0138924), hereinafter ‘Pristine’, and Griswold (US 20050261046).”

Claims 12, 13, and 24 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Lux in vie”w of Pristine, and Block and further in view of Tushie et al. (US 2003/0050899), hereinafter ‘Tushie.’”

“Claims 28-29 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Cindy M. Lux (US 2004/0186744), hereinafter ‘Lux,’ in view of Gorsev Pristin (US 2004/0138924), hereinafter ‘Pristine,’ and Griswold (US 20050261046) and further in view of Morgan.”

Mark Nowotarski

Reviewer: Mark Nowotarski
Professional Association: President, Markets, Patents & Alliances L.L.C.
Total Applications Reviewed: 19
Total Prior Art Submissions: 21
Total Prior Art Annotations: 12
Total Discussion Postings: 43

Submission: Making Typical Silicon Matter with Razor (2004)
Application: Tuning core voltages of processors
Application Number: 11/312,201
Publication Number: 20070174746
Publication Date: July 26, 2007
Inventor Name: Haefliger; Juerg; et al.
Assignee: Hewlett Packard Company
Use in USPTO Office Action:

“Claims 2,4,7,9,10,13,18 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Mikaye et al. (JP 2001-034502) in view of Safford et al. (USPN 7296181B2) in view of Nanja (2005/0132238A1) in further view of Austin et al. (Making Typical Silicon Matter with Razor).”

 
September 8, 2008 (Second non-final). “Claims 2,4,7 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Miyake et. al. (JP 2001-034502) in view of Safford et al. (USPN 7296181B2) in view of Nanja (2005/0132238A1) in further view of Austin et al. (Making Typical Silicon Matter with Razor).”

Submission: Method of Raising Capital for Early State Companies Through Broker- Dealer US 20030028467
Application: Ecosystem allowing compliance with prescribed requirements or objectives
Application Number: 11927189
Publication Number: 20080221945
Publication Date: 9-11-2008
Inventor Name: Robert Pace
Assignee: Goldman Sachs

Use in the USPTO Office Action:

6-17-2009 (non-final)- “Claims 3-4, 10-11, 20-21 and 25 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Miller et al in view of Sanborn (US 20030028467).

3-11-2010 (final). “Claims 3-4 and 25 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Milliard et al in view of Sanborn (US 20030028467).

Helen Shi

Reviewer: Helen Shi
Professional Association: Grad/Undergrad Student
Total Applications Reviewed: 4
Total Prior Art Submissions: 13
Total Prior Art Annotations: 0
Total Discussion Postings: 15
Submission: EFFICACY OF A CERTIFIED ORGANIC HERBICIDE BASED ON PINE ESSENCE
Application: Herbicide composition and weed control method
Application Number: 12/934969
Publication Number: 20110028332
Publication Date: February 3, 2011
Inventor Name: Keisuke Sekino
Assignee: SDS Biotech K.K.
Use in USPTO Office Action:

August 29, 2011 (Non-Final Rejection). “Claims 19-23, 25-29 and 32-36 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(b) as being anticipated by James et al. (New Zealand Plant Protection, 2002).

Submission: Biological Activity of Extracts from Zea mays L. and Pinus densiflora L.
Application: Herbicide composition and weed control method
Application Number: 12/934969
Publication Number: 20110028332
Publication Date: February 3, 2011
Inventor Name: Keisuke Sekino
Assignee: SDS Biotech K.K.
Use in USPTO Office Action:

August 29, 2011 (Non-Final Rejection). “Claims 19-23, 25-29 and 32-36 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(b) as being anticipated by Joo et al. (Korea Turfgrass Science, 1998).”

Alberto Araiza

Reviewer: Alberto Araiza
Professional Association: Grad/Undergrad Student
Total Applications Reviewed: 8
Total Prior Art Submissions: 6
Total Prior Art Annotations: 0
Total Discussion Postings: 8
Submission: Signatures for facilitating hot upgrades of modular software components
Application: Remote update of computers based on physical device recognition
Application Number: 12/818,906
Publication Number: 20100333081
Publication Date: December 30, 2010
Inventor Name: Craig Stephen Etchegoyen
Assignee: Uniloc USA Inc.
Use in USPTO Office Action:

August 12, 2011 (Non-Final Rejection). “Claims 1-17 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over alSafadi in view of U.S. 6,880,086 (hereinafter “Kidder”).”

Claude Baudoin

Reviewer: Claude Baudoin
Professional Association: Computer Professional/Technologist
Total Applications Reviewed: 12
Total Prior Art Submissions: 3
Total Prior Art Annotations: 0
Total Discussion Postings: 16
Submission: Zachman Enterprise Architecture Framework
Application: Ten-level enterprise architecture systems and tools
Application Number: 12/425318
Publication Number: 20100268561
Publication Date: October 21, 2010
Inventor Name: Kerry John Enright
Assignee: Pro-Se – Enright
Use in USPTO Office Action:

August 10, 2011 (Non-Final Rejection). “Claims 1 and 2 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(b) as being anticipated by Zachman, J.A. A Framework for Information Systems Architecture. IBM Systems Journal, Vol 26, No 3, 1987 (hereinafter ‘Zachman’).

“Claim 4 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Zachman in view of US 2008/066067 A1 to Stimpson et al. (hereinafter ‘Stimpson’).”

“Claim 5 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Zachman in view of US 2007/0150514 A1 to Chen et al. (hereinafter ‘Chen’).”

“Claim 8 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Zachman in view of US 2006/016144 to Lubrecht et al. (hereinafter ‘Lubrecht’).”

“Claim 11 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Zachman in view of US 2006/0005036 to Hu et al. (hereinafter ‘Hu’).”

“Claim 13 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Zachman in view of US 2008/0300949 A1 to Boss et al. (hereinafter ‘Boss’).”

“Claim 3 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Zachman in view of Stimpson and US 2005/0144033 A1 to Vreeke et al. (hereinafter ‘Vreeke’).”

Ankush Bedi

Reviewer: Ankush Bedi
Professional Association: IPPRO
Total Applications Reviewed: 7
Total Prior Art Submissions: 3
Total Prior Art Annotations: 0
Total Discussion Postings: 0

Submission: Network Booting apparatus and method
Application: Booting Utilizing Electronic Mail
Application Number: 11648007
Publication Number: 20080162919
Publication Date: 7-3-2008
Inventor Name: Vincent Zimmer
Assignee: Intel

Use in the USPTO Office Action:

12-22-2009 (Final). “Claims 1,9 and 17-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being obvious over James JR (Frye) U.S. Patent Publication No 2003/0126426 in view of Lipscombe et al. (Lipscombe) U.S. Patent Application Publication No 2008/0155245.”

Rob Cameron

Rob Cameron

Reviewer: Rob Cameron
Professional Association: Professor, Simon Fraser University
Total Applications Reviewed: 6
Total Prior Art Submissions: 2
Total Prior Art Annotations: 0
Total Discussion Postings: 6

Submission: Housely, “Cryptographic Message Syntax” (1999)(2005)
Application: Cipher method and system for verifying a decryption of an encrypted user data key
Application Number: 11/329773
Publication Number: 20070160202
Publication Date: January 11, 2006
Inventor Name: Andrew Wilt, Michael Kelly
Assignee: IBM
Use in USPTO Office Action: ”Claims 1, 15 are rejected under 35 USC 102(b) as being anticipated by Housley, Cryptographic Message Syntax (published June 1999).”

July 2, 2008 (Final). “Claims 15, 22 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(b) as being anticipated by Housley, Cryptographic Message Syntax (published June 1999).”

Jimmy Chen

Reviewer: Jimmy Chen
Professional Association: IBM
Total Applications Reviewed: 2
Total Prior Art Submissions: 6
Total Prior Art Annotations: 0
Total Discussion Postings: 0

Submission: Parameterized test driven development
Application Number: 11759144
Publication Number: 20080307264
Publication Date:
12-11-2008
Inventor Name:
Jonathan Paul de Halleux
Assignee:
Microsoft

Use in the USPTO Office Action:

“Claims 8 and 9 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Salvador, as applied to claim 1 above, in view of U.S. Pub. No. 2008/0115114 to Palaparthi et al. (Palaparthi)”

 

Jason DeVeau Rosen

Reviewer: Jason DeVeau Rosen
Professional Association: Grad/Undergrad Student
Total Applications Reviewed: 22
Total Prior Art Submissions: 16
Total Prior Art Annotations: 0
Total Discussion Postings: 19
Submission: PrintedTP.com
Application: Method for providing tissue products having coordinated decor features
Application Number: 11/935,509
Publication Number: 20090119118
Publication Date: May 7, 2009
Inventor Name: Rachael Eden Walther
Assignee: Procter & Gamble Company
Use in USPTO Office Action:

January 7, 2010 (Non-Final). “Claims 1 and 8-9 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(b) as being anticipated by Carlberg Design Incorporated (http://web.archive.org/web/20050323231641/printedtb.com/), hereinafter referred to as Carlberg.”

“Claim 10 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Carlberg Design Incorporated (http://web.archive.org/web/20050323231641/printedtb.com/; (http://web.archive.org/web/20050323231641/www.liquidshirts.com/merchant.mvc?Screen=CTGY&Store_Code=LS&Category_Code=TP) hereinafter referred to as Carlberg.”

“Claims 2-7 and 11-12 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Carlberg Design Incorporated (http://web.archive.org/web/20050323231641/printedtb.com/), hereinafter referred to as Carlberg, in view of Kaufman (US PGPub 2003/0126028 A1).”

April 26, 2010 (Final). ”Claims 1 and 3-12 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Carlberg Design Incorporated (http://web.archive.org/web/20050323231641/printedtb.com/; (http://web.archive.org/web/20050323231641/www.liquidshirts.com/merchant.mvc?Screen=CTGY&Store_Code=LS&Category_Code=TP) hereinafter referred to as Carlberg, in view of Kaufman (US PGPub 2003/0126028 A1).”

“Claim 13 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Carlberg Design Incorporated (http://web.archive.org/web/20050323231641/printedtb.com/), hereinafter referred to as Carlberg, in view of Kaufman (US PGPub 2003/0126028 A1) in further view of Official Notice.”

July 23, 2010 (Non-Final). ”Claims 1 and 3-12 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Carlberg Design Incorporated (http://web.archive.org/web/20050323231641/printedtb.com/; (http://web.archive.org/web/20050323231641/www.liquidshirts.com/merchant.mvc?Screen=CTGY&Store_Code=LS&Category_Code=TP) hereinafter referred to as Carlberg, in view of Kaufman (US PGPub 2003/0126028 A1).”

 

Walter Dietrich

Reviewer: Walter Dietrich
Professional Association: Senior Technical Staff Member, IBM
Total Applications Reviewed: 1
Total Prior Art Submissions: 4
Total Prior Art Annotations: 0
Total Discussion Postings: 1

Submission: WebSphere Application Server – Express V6 Developers Guide and Development Examples (2005)
Application: System and method for retaining information in a data management system
Application Number: 11/342,055
Publication Number: 20070180110
Publication Date: August 2, 2007
Inventor Name: Gopal; Bhasker
Assignee: GE Medical Systems Information Technologies, Inc.
Use in USPTO Office Action:

“Claims 1, 10, 18, and 20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a) as being anticipated by Moore, “Websphere App. Server-Express V6 Development Guide and Development Examples”, October 21, 2005.”

Gabe Gomez

Reviewer: Gabe Gomez
Professional Association: MIT
Total Applications Reviewed: 2
Total Prior Art Submissions: 3
Total Prior Art Annotations: 0
Total Discussion Postings: 1

Submission: Image Transformation System for Producing a Kaleidoscope Effect Application: Image Inversion
Application Number: 11489337
Publication Number: 20080022202
Publication Date: 1-24-2008
Inventor Name: Murray D Craig
Assignee: Hewlett Packard Inc.

Use in the USPTO Office Action:

July 19, 2006 (Non-Final Rejection). “Claims 3 and 11 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Dworsky in view of Shiraishi et al. (US 6,091,423) hereinafter Shiraishi.”

 
July 31, 2008 (Non-Final). ”Claims 3 and 11 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Dworsky in view of Shiraiski et al. (US 6,091,423) hereinafter Shiraishi.”

January 23, 2009 (Final). ”Claims 3 and 11 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Dworsky in view of Shiraiski et al. (US 6,091,423) hereinafter Shiraishi.”

Conrad Hermann

Reviewer: Conrad Herrmann
Professional Association: Academic Technologist/Engineer
Total Applications Reviewed: 5
Total Prior Art Submissions: 7
Total Prior Art Annotations: 0
Total Discussion Postings: 5
Submission: Method and apparatus for controlling program execution and program distribution
Application: Verification of loadable objects
Application Number: 11/809,617
Publication Number: 20080301712
Publication Date: December 4, 2008
Inventor Name: James P. Schneider
Assignee: Red Hat/BSTZ
Use in USPTO Office Action:

April 27, 2010 (Final). “Claims 1 – 20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over U.S. Patent No. 6,694,434 to McGee at al. [hereinafter McGee, previously cited] in view of U.S. Patent Publication Application No. 20030177394 to Dozortsev.”

Thomas Irizarry

Reviewer: Thomas Irizarry
Professional Association: Grad/Undergrad Student
Total Applications Reviewed: 10
Total Prior Art Submissions: 6
Total Prior Art Annotations: 5
Total Discussion Postings: 0
Submission: Secure flash memory device and method of operation
Application: Secure delivery of digital media via flash device
Application Number: 12/474,162
Publication Number: 20100306450
Publication Date: December 2, 2010
Inventor Name: Michael Lee Nard
Assignee: HP
Use in USPTO Office Action:

August 22, 2011 (Non-Final Rejection). “Claims 1, 3-4 and 6 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Chiao et al. (USPN: 6,904,493), hereinafter referred as Chiao, in view of Lee at al. (USPN: 7,457,897), hereinafter Lee, or Nakazawa et al. (USPN: 2001/0010663), hereinafter Nakazawa, each taken separately.”

“Claims 2, 5, and 7-22 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Chiao in view of Lee or Nakazawa, each taken separately, further in view of Kimura (USPN: 5,371,793).”

Durga Kandasamy

Reviewer: Durga Kandasamy
Professional Association: n/a
Total Applications Reviewed: 11
Total Prior Art Submissions: 9
Total Prior Art Annotations: 1
Total Discussion Postings: 2
Submission: Bulimia Nervosa and Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder: A Possible Role for Stimulant Medication
Application: Method of treating binge eating disorder and obesity resulting from binge eating behavior
Application Number: 12/666,460
Publication Number: 20110021564
Publication Date: Jan. 27, 2011
Inventor Name: Louis Sanfilippo
Assignee: LCS Group, LLC
Use in USPTO Office Action:

July 21, 2011 (Non-Final Rejection): “Claims 1, 3, 4, 6, and 8 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Dukram (Journal of Women’s Health, 14(5); 345-350 (2005)), as evidenced by The American Heritage Medical Dictionary (binge eating disorder) (2007) (see attached PTO-892)), in view of Mickle et al (US Pat. Pub. No. 2005/0038121 A1, published Feb. 17, 2005 (see attached PTO-892)).”

July 21, 2011 (Non-Final Rejection): ”Claims 7, 30, and 31 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Dukarm (Journal of Women’s Health, 14(5); 345-350 (2005)), as evidenced by The American Heritage Medical Dictionary (binge eating disorder) (2007) (see attached PTO-892)), in view of Mickle et al (US Pat. Pub. No. 2005/0038121 A1, published Feb. 17, 2005 (see attached PTO-892)), as applied to Claims 1, 3, and 6, and further in view of Krishnan et al (Biol. Psychiatry, 59:1S-264S, pg. 2275 (May 2006)).”

Sharat Mendu

Reviewer: Sharat Mendu
Professional Association: Lawyer/Legal Professional
Total Applications Reviewed: 1
Total Prior Art Submissions: 3
Total Prior Art Annotations: 1
Total Discussion Postings: 0

Submission: Automatic discovery of network elements, U.S. Patent 5185860
Application: Computer compliance system and method
Application Number: 11/437,223
Publication Number: 20070271363
Publication Date: November 22, 2007
Inventor Name: Kevin Ross
Assignee: GE
Use in USPTO Office Action: “Claims 1-5, 7-10, 13-15, and 18-23 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Wu in US Patent 5,185,860, hereafter referred to as “Wu” in view of Barroux in US Patent 5,923,850”

“Claims 6 and 16 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Wu in view of Barroux as applied to claims 1 and 13 above, and further in view of Cole et al. in US 2004/0015728.”

Paul Merolla

Reviewer: Paul Merolla
Professional Association: Research Scientist
Total Applications Reviewed: 1
Total Prior Art Submissions: 1
Total Prior Art Annotations: 0
Total Discussion Postings: 0
Submission: ARC-UI: Visualization Tool for Associative Classifiers
Application: Interactive visualization for generating ensemble classifiers
Application Number: 12/408,663
Publication Number: 20100241596
Publication Date: September 23, 2010
Inventor Name: Bongshin Lee
Assignee: Microsoft Corporation
Use in USPTO Office Action:

October 19, 2011 (Non-Final Rejection). “Claims 1, 11 and 13 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a) as being anticipated by Chodos et al. (‘ARC-UI: A Visulaization for Associative Classifiers’, 12th Intl. Conf. Information Visualization, 2008, pp. 296-301), hereinafter Chodos.”

John Moore

Reviewer: John Moore
Professional Association: Computer Professional/Technologist
Total Applications Reviewed: 3
Total Prior Art Submissions: 2
Total Prior Art Annotations: 0
Total Discussion Postings: 1
Submission: Image browsing apparatus and image browsing method
Application: Matching a slideshow to an audio track
Application Number: 11590034
Publication Number: 20080104494
Publication Date: May 1, 2008
Inventor Name: Simon Widdowson
Assignee: HP
Use in USPTO Office Action:

December 24, 2008 (Non-Final). “Claim 12 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Fairhurst in view of Ahmad further in view of Matsuyama (Pub. No. US 2006/0127054; hereinafter Matsuyama).”

May 11, 2009 (Final). “Claim 12 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Fairhurst in view of Ahmad further in view of Matsuyama (Pub. No. US 2006/0127054 A1; hereinafter Matsuyama).”

Jeff Morrill

Reviewer: Jeff Morrill
Professional Association: VP, Point and Click Solutions
Total Applications Reviewed: 4
Total Prior Art Submissions: 4
Total Prior Art Annotations: 0
Total Discussion Postings: 1

Submission: Models and issues in data stream systems
Application: Method of obtaining data samples from a data stream and of estimating the sortedness of the data stream based on the samples
Application Number: 11/405,994
Publication Number: 20070244891
Publication Date: October 18, 2007
Inventor Name: Gopalan; Parikshit; et al.
Assignee: International Business Machines Corporation
Use in USPTO Office Action: ”Claims 1-5, 7-11, 13-16, and 18-19 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(b) as being anticipated by Babcock et al. (NPL “Models and Issues in data Stream Systems” ACM PODS, June 3-6, 2002, PP 1-16).”

“Claims 6, 12, 17, and 20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Babcock et al. (NPL “Models and Issues in data Stream Systems” ACM PODS, June 3-6, 2002, PP 1-16) in view of Ailon et al. (NPL “Estimating the Distance to a Monotone Function” 2005, PP 1-18).”

 
September 30, 2009 (Final). “Claims 1-4, 7-10, 13-15, and 18 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Babcock et al. (Babcock hereinafter) (NPL “Models and Issues in data Stream Systems” ACM PODS, June 3-6, 2002, PP 1-16) in view of Castro et al. (Castro hereinafter) (NPL “Sorting, Measures of disorder, and Worst-case performance” 1991, PP 124-131).

“Claims 6, 12, 17, and 20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Babcock et al. (NPL “Models and Issues in data Stream Systems” ACM PODS, June 3-6, 2002, PP 1-16) in view of Castro et al. (NPL “Sorting, Measures of disorder, and Worst-case performance” 1991, PP 124-131) as applied to claim 1-4, 7-10, 13-15, and 18 above, further in view of Ailon et al. (Ailon hereinafter) (NPL “Estimating the Distance to a Monotone Function” 2005, PP 1-18).”

Timothy Myers

Reviewer: Timothy Myers
Professional Association: Hewlett-Packard
Total Applications Reviewed: 6
Total Prior Art Submissions: 13
Total Prior Art Annotations: 0
Total Discussion Postings: 0
Submission: US 20080243607 Related Entity Content Identification
Application: Method
Application Number: 12/988,738
Publication Number: 20110035381
Publication Date: Feb. 10, 2011
Inventor Name: Simon Giles Thompson
Assignee: British Telecommunications Public Limited Company
Use in USPTO Office Action:

Sept. 8, 2011 (Non-Final): “Claims 3-5 are rejected as being unpatentable over Forrest in view of Rohan et al (US Publication No. 2008/0243607, filed March 30, 2007, hereinafter “Rohan”).

Bindu Nair

Reviewer: Bindu Nair
Professional Association: Lawyer/Legal Professional
Total Applications Reviewed: 13
Total Prior Art Submissions: 3
Total Prior Art Annotations: 0
Total Discussion Postings: 1
Submission: System and method for creating a secure trusted social network
Application: Trust and identity in secure calendar sharing collaboration
Application Number: 12/472,885
Publication Number: 20100306824
Publication Date: December 2, 2010
Inventor Name: Daniel C. Gurney
Assignee: IBM
Use in USPTO Office Action:

October 13, 2011 (Non-Final Rejection). “Claims 1-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Lee et al. (US Pub. 2008/0195705) (Hereinafter Lee) in view of Tam et al (U.S. Patent 7,797,732) (Hereinafter Tam).”

Van Nguy

Reviewer: Van Nguy
Professional Association: Lawyer/Legal Professional
Total Applications Reviewed: 2
Total Prior Art Submissions: 2
Total Prior Art Annotations: 0
Total Discussion Postings: 0
Submission: ArcGIS(R) 9: Using Military Overlay Editor 9.1 for ArcGIS(R)
Application: Business data display and position correction in street-side imagery
Application Number: 12/414,429
Publication Number: 20100250109
Publication Date: September 30, 2010
Inventor Name: Carolyn P. Johnston
Assignee: Microsoft Corporation
Use in USPTO Office Action:

October 17, 2011 (Non-Final Rejection). “Claims 1, 3-4, 8-11, 13-14, and 17 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a) as being anticipated by ArcGIS 3D Analyst Tutorial (hereinafter ArcGIS)).”

“Claim 2 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over ArcGIS in view of Ofek (US Patent Publication 20070076920).”

“Claims 5-7, 15-16, and 19-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over ArcGIS in view of Kreft (US Patent 7388519).”

“Claims 12 and 18 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over ArcGIS in view of Zhu et al. (US Patent Publication 20090179895)(hereinafter Zhu).”

William Pagan

Reviewer: William Pagan
Professional Association: IBM Engineer
Total Applications Reviewed: 5
Total Prior Art Submissions: 4
Total Prior Art Annotations: 0
Total Discussion Postings: 4
Submission: Using Data Mining as a Strategy for Assessing Asynchronous Discussion Forums
Application: Model Semantic and Structure of Threaded Discussions
Application Number: 12/414,598
Publication Number: 20100250597
Publication Date: Sept. 30, 2010
Inventor Name: Yang Jiang-Ming
Assignee: Microsoft Corporation
Use in USPTO Office Action:

(Sept. 29, 2011 – Non-Final): “Claims 3 and 4 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Zhang in view of “Using Data Mining as a Strategy for Assessing Asynchronous Discussion Forums” (“Dringus”).

Charles Peck

Reviewer: Charles Peck
Professional Association:
Total Applications Reviewed: 1
Total Prior Art Submissions: 4
Total Prior Art Annotations: 1
Total Discussion Postings: 1

Submission: A High-Performance, Pipelined, FPGA-Based Genetic Algorithm Machine
Application: System and method for implementing a multi objective evolutionary algorithm on a programmable logic hardware device
Application Number: 11/485,101
Publication Number: 20080016013
Publication Date: January 17, 2008
Inventor Name: Rajesh Subbu
Assignee: GE
Use in USPTO Office Action: “Claims 1-3, 11-13, and 19-22 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Shackleford et al. (A High-Performance, Pipelined, FPGA-Based Genetic Algorithm Machine) in view of Gaspar-Cunha (A Multi-Objective Evoluntionary Algorithm Using Neural Network to Approximate Fitness Evaluations)”

 
March 8, 2010 (Final): “Claims 1-3, 11-14, 16, 18-22 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(b) as being anticipated by Shackleford, et al, A High-Performance, Pipelined, FPGA-Based Genetic Algorithm Machine, Genetic Programming and Evolvable Machines, 2, 2011, pp. 33-60.”

Abhay Porwal

Reviewer: Abhay Porwal
Professional Association: Patent Professional/Searcher
Total Applications Reviewed: 2
Total Prior Art Submissions: 2
Total Prior Art Annotations: 1
Total Discussion Postings: 2

Submission: Method and system for automatic presentation of default-drop target icons at window borders, U.S. Patent 5,745,111
Application: Smart Drag and Drop
Application Number: 11/393,198
Publication Number: 20070234226
Publication Date: October 4, 2007
Inventor Name: Szeto; Christopher T.
Assignee: Yahoo! Inc.
Use in USPTO Office Action: “Claims 1-4, 6-9, 12-18, and 20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(b) as being anticipated by Cline et al (US patent number 5,745,111).”

“Claim 5 is rejected under U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Cline et al (US patent number 5,745,111) in view of Yagi et al (US patent number 6,393,429).”

“Claims 10-11 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Cline et al (US patent number 5,745,111) in view of Cummins et al (US Publication number 2006/0070007).”

“Claim 19 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Cline et al (Cline, US patent number 5,745,111) in view of Kung et al (US Patent number 7,296,025).”

 
April 7, 2011 (Final). “Claims 1-4, 6-15, and 21-25 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Cline et al (5,745,111) in view of Cummins et al (20060070007).”
 

Rishi Rawat

Reviewer: Rishi Rawat
Professional Association: Grad/Undergrad Student
Total Applications Reviewed: 9
Total Prior Art Submissions: 14
Total Prior Art Annotations: 8
Total Discussion Postings: 10
Submission: Synthesis and anticancer activity of geldanamycin derivatives derived from biosynthetically generated metabolites
Application: Set of geldanamycin derivatives and their preparation methods
Application Number: 12/812,817
Publication Number: 20100311694
Publication Date: December 30, 2010
Inventor Name: Zhuorong Li
Assignee: Institute for Medicinal Biotechnology, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences
Use in USPTO Office Action:

September 15, 2011 (Non-Final Rejection). “Claim 1 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(b) as being anticipated by Schnur et al. (J. Med. Chem. 1995, 38, 3813-3820).”

Adam Roach

Reviewer: Adam Roach
Professional Association: Engineer
Total Applications Reviewed: 1
Total Prior Art Submissions: 1
Total Prior Art Annotations: 0
Total Discussion Postings: 0
Submission: XML Inclusions with Content Negotiation
Application: Associating version information with a component document of a modular document
Application Number: 12/511,523
Publication Number: 20110029634
Publication Date: February 3, 2011
Inventor Name: Roger Brian Gimson
Assignee: HP
Use in USPTO Office Action:

September 22, 2011 (Non-Final Rejection). “Claims 1-3, 5, 8-16, 18 and 19 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over W3C’s ‘XML Inclusions (XInclude) Version 1.0 (Second Edition)’ (hereinafter XInclude) in further view of Andrey Shur et al. (US 2005/02672241 A1, hereinafter Shur).”

“Claims 4 and 6 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over XInclude-Shur as applied above in further view of Official Notice.”

Christian Seifert

Reviewer: Christian Seifert
Professional Association: None given
Total Applications Reviewed: 1
Total Prior Art Submissions: 1
Total Prior Art Annotations: 0
Total Discussion Postings: 3

Submission: A Crawler-based Study of Spyware on the Web
Application: Honey monkey network exploration
Application Number: 11/276,483
Publication Number: 20070208822
Publication Date: September 6, 2007
Inventor Name: Wang; Yi-Min; et al.
Assignee: Microsoft Corporation
Use in USPTO Office Action: ”Claims 3-9 and 18-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Holz as applied to claim1 above, and in further view of Alexander Moshchuck et al., [A Crawler-based Study of Spyware on the web]”

Ian Shields

Reviewer: Ian Shields
Professional Association: Linux Technologist
Total Applications Reviewed:
Total Prior Art Submissions: 5
Total Prior Art Annotations: 0
Total Discussion Postings: 5
Submission: Tailored-List and Recombination-Delaying Buddy Systems
Application: Modified Buddy System Memory Allocation
Application Number: 11553444
Publication Number: 20080104353
Publication Date: May 1, 2008
Inventor Name: Prashanth Madisetti
Assignee: HP
Use in USPTO Office Action:

“Claims 1-5, 7-10, 13-16, and 19-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Kaufman (Variations on the Binary Buddy System for Dynamic Memory Management) in view of Knippel (U.S. Patent #6,839,822).”

Eun Sol Cho

Reviewer: Eun Sol Cho
Professional Association: student
Total Applications Reviewed: 17
Total Prior Art Submissions: 2
Total Prior Art Annotations: 0
Total Discussion Postings: 15
Submission: Natural Herbicides and Amendments for Organic Weed Control
Application: Herbicide composition and weed control method
Application Number: 12/934969
Publication Number: 20110028332
Publication Date: February 3, 2011
Inventor Name: Keisuke Sekino
Assignee: SDS Biotech K.K.
Use in USPTO Office Action:

August 29, 2011 (Non-Final Rejection). “Claims 19-23, 25-29 and 32-34 and 36 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(b) as being anticipated by Miller (Crop Protection Products for Organic Agriculture, 2006).”

Sujith Subramanian

Reviewer: Sujith Subramanian
Professional Association: Tata Consultancy Services
Total Applications Reviewed: 6
Total Prior Art Submissions: 4
Total Prior Art Annotations: 0
Submission: Secure Biometric Verification of Identity
Application: Systems and Methods for Encrypting Patient Data
Application Number: 20090110192
Publication Number: April 30, 2009
Inventor Name: Mark A. Elrod
Assignee: GE
Use in USPTO Office Action:

(11/23/2009, Non-Final): “Claim 14 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(b) as being anticipated by Saito (US 2004/129787).”

Haritha Tapa

Reviewer: Haritha Tapa
Professional Association:
Total Applications Reviewed: 11
Total Prior Art Submissions: 4
Total Prior Art Annotations: 0
Total Discussion Postings: 8
Submission: Embedding certifications in executable files for network transmission
Application: Integrity service using regenerated trust integrity gather program
Application Number: 12/466803
Publication Number: 20100293373
Publication Date: November 18, 2010
Inventor Name: Gerald Francis McBrearty
Assignee: IBM Corporation
Use in USPTO Office Action:

September 15, 2011 (Non-Final Rejection). “Claims 1-4, 8-11 and 14-17 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Atkinson et al., US Patent Number 6367012 B1, hereinafter Atkinson, and in views of Novosad, US Patent Number 7930557 B2.”

“Claims 5, 12 and 18 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Atkinson et al., US Patent Number 6367012 B1, hereinafter Atkinson, and in views of Novosad, US Patent Number 7930557 B2, as applied to claims 1, 8 and 14 above, and further in views of Alessi et al., US Patent Application Publication Number 2004/0025034 A1, hereinafter Alessi.”

“Claims 6, 13 and 19 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Atkinson et al., US Patent Number 6367012 B1, hereinafter Atkinson, and in views of Novosad, US Patent Number 7930557 B2, as applied to claims 1, 8 and 14 above, and further in views of Alessi et al., US Patent Application Publication Number 2004/0025034 A1, hereinafter Alessi, as applied to claims 1, 5, 12 and 18 above, and further in views of DiFalco et al., US Patent Application Publication Number 2004/0059930 A1, hereinafter DiFalco.”

“Claims 7 and 20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Atkinson et al., US Patent Number 6367012 B1, hereinafter Atkinson, and in views of Novosad, US Patent Number 7930557 B2, as applied to claims 1 and 14 above, and further in views of Mittal et al., US Patent 6952770 B1, hereinafter Mittal.”

Yeen Tham

Reviewer: Yeen Tham
Professional Association:
Total Applications Reviewed: 29
Total Prior Art Submissions: 44
Total Prior Art Annotations: 2
Total Discussion Postings: 6
Submission: Automatic Image Annotation By An Iterative Approach: Incorporating Keyword Correlations And Region Matching
Application: Scalable Clustering
Application Number: 12/421853
Publication Number: 20100262568
Publication Date: October 14, 2010
Inventor Name: Alton Schwaighofer
Assignee: IBM Corporation
Use in USPTO Office Action:

October 4, 2011 (Non-Final Rejection). “Claims 1, 3, 19, and 20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(b) as being anticipated by Zhou.”

“Claims 2, 8, and 9 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Zhou.”

“Claims 6 and 7 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Zhou, as applied to claim 1 above, and further in view of Modha.”

“Claim 12 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Zhou, as applied to claim 1 above, and further in view of Bradley.”

“Claim 13 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Zhou, as applied to claim 1 above, and further in view of Foti.”

“Claim 12 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Zhou, as applied to claim 1 above, and further in view of Bradley.”

“Claim 14 and 15 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Zhou, as applied to claim 1 above, and further in view of Bradley, as applied to claim 12 above, and further in view of Chen.”

Henning Thienemann

Reviewer: Henning Thienemann
Professional Association: Suzlon Energy GmbH
Total Applications Reviewed: 1
Total Prior Art Submissions: 2
Total Prior Art Annotations: 0
Total Discussion Postings: 0

Submission: Method for Assigning an IP address to a device
Application: Method for Configuring a Windfarm
Application Number: 11/380939
Publication Number:
20070255832
Publication Date:
11-1-2007
Inventor Name:
Andre Reisberg
Assignee:
GE

Use in the USPTO Office Action:

June 12, 2008 and August 11, 2009 (non-final). “Claims 1-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Applicant’s Admitted Prior Art (hereinafter referred to as “AAPA”) in view of Steindl (US 2005/0163118 A1)

February 1, 2010. “Claims 1, 3-8 and 10-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Steindle (US 2005/0163118 A1) in view of Pionzio, JR et al. (US 2002/0029097).

 
June 4, 2010 (Final). “Claims 1, 3-8 and 10-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Steindl (US 2005/0163118 A1) in view of Pionzio, JR et al. (US 2002/0029097).”

Kathy Wang

Reviewer: Kathy Wang
Professional Association: Lead Infosec Engineer, MITRE Corporation
Total Applications Reviewed: 1
Total Prior Art Submissions: 1
Total Prior Art Annotations: 1
Total Discussion Postings: 0

Submission: Honeyclient proactive client-side exploit detection technology
Application: Honey monkey network exploration
Application Number: 11/276,483
Publication Number: 20070208822
Publication Date: September 6, 2007
Inventor Name: Wang; Yi-Min; et al.
Assignee: Microsoft Corporation
Use in USPTO Office Action: “Claims 1-2 and 16 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a) as being anticipated by Kathy Wang [Using Honeyclients to Detect New Attacks, dated on ToorCon, 2005]”

Kent Williams

Reviewer: Kent Williams
Professional Association: USPTO Patent Examiner
Total Applications Reviewed: 1
Total Prior Art Submissions: 1
Total Prior Art Annotations: 1
Total Discussion Postings: 0

Submission: Method a system for providing device driver configurations on demand US Patent 5, 815, 731
Application: Method and Apparatus for Delivering Device Drivers
Application Number: 11/329656
Publication Number: 20070162625
Publication Date:
7/12/2007
Inventor Name:
Ashley N Saulsbury
Assignee:
Sun Microsystems Inc.

Use in the USPTO Office Action:

“Claims 2-4, 10, 15, 16 rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Mohammed et al., U.S. Patent 5,815, 731 and Lopez et al., U.S. Patent 2006/028195 in further view of Cota-Robles et al., U.S. Patent Application Publication 2002/0143842.

“Claims 6 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Mohammed et al., U.S. Patent 5,815,731 and Lopez et al., U.S. Patent Application 2006/028195 in further view of Applicant’s Admitted Prior Art (AAPA).”

“Claims 12 and 19 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Mohammed et al., U.S. Patent 5,815,731 and Lopez et al., U.S. Patent Application 2006/028195 in further view of Piazza et al., U.S. Patent Application Publication 2003/0084380.”

“Claim 17 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Mohammed et al., U.S. Patent 5,815,731 and Lopez et al., U.S. Patent Application Publication 2006/0280195 in further view of Hamilton et al., U.S. Patent 7,107,330.

 

Amanda Willis

 
Reviewer: Amanda Willis
Professional Association: Patent Professional/Searcher
Total Applications Reviewed: 26
Total Prior Art Submissions: 13
Total Prior Art Annotations: 0
Total Discussion Postings: 0
Submission:Skin compositions containing hydrocortisone
Application:Skin compositions containing hydrocortisone
Application Number: 12/583017
Publication Number: 20100303742
Publication Date: December 2, 2010
Inventor Name: Norman Turkowitz
Assignee: Pro-Se – Turkowitz
Use in USPTO Office Action:

June 28, 2011 (Non-Final Rejection). “Claims 1, 3-7, 9-17, 20, and 24 are rejected on the ground of nonstatutory obviousness-type double patenting as being unpatentable over claims 1-17 of U.S. Patent No. 7,666,859 (‘859).”