Pre-Grant Publication Number: 20070220583
Collaborate on the process of community review for this application. Posting will not be forwarded to the USPTO. Flagging a post as an ACTION ITEM signals further research. Flagging SPAM and ABUSE helps to manage discussion. Placing double brackets around a reference to a claim or prior art will create a hyperlink to the original ex. [[claim 1]] and [[prior art 2]].

Please review the Community Code of Conduct prior to posting

Discussion (5)
  Facilitator's Comment     Action Item
Show without Noise
4
Eric Barsness (6 months ago)
There are a variety of patents and applications pending related to viewing different versions of a video program. They aren't focussed on the editing/assembling part as much as the viewing part. There seems to be some strong art on the assembling pieces. As for the viewing, take a look at www.clearplay.com (and search on MovieMask, which is no longer active but did something similar) where you can watch a standed DVD with a "profile" to see an edited version (without objectional content for example). The patents and apps I mentioned are US6813438, US6889383, and US20060101487A1. The second patent discusses "reframing" content, so is not just skipping parts (it is one of ClearPlay's patents).
3
Lisa Seacat (6 months ago)
Regarding Claim 00002
This idea reminds me a lot of those "Choose your own adventure" books. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Choose_Your_Own_Adventure
Where you get to a point in the story line and you get to decide what the character does. Based on your decision the outcome of the story changes. So if you decide for the character to take door #1 then they have a different adventure than they would've under door #2.

Applying this idea to movies playing different clips based on user selection seems novel and very interesting. Could change the way the movie going experience is currently today. The audience could vote as a whole on which option to select.
Lisa Seacat (6 months ago)
Along the lines of above. Image if you're watching a movie with your kids and there is a scene that is rated R. Perhaps the menu would show two options: 1. the PG version 2. the R version. Which would allow families to skip the bad content but still enjoy the movie together.
2
Manuel Perez (6 months ago)
The only difference I see between the present invention and the known prior art is the fact that the user can select between different "cuts" of the movie and that feature does not appear to be "technical" (because it has to do only with the video stream content); I think therefore, that from the technical point of view, the invention is not new and/or inventive.
1
Jim Campagne (7 months ago)
This idea under review is about putting a menu in a movie that allows the viewer to select alternative scenes. Its features are intended to be interactive, including hyperlinks to the world wide web. This will allow for greater depth of information on whatever media is being used. From the technical aspects we understood it seems very similar to current technology. Until further benefits are shown for other types of media (not movies) we feel that the current idea under discussion is too similar to what is already out there to warrant a patent. Certain aspects of this new technology open up doors that may not be wanted by the end user (i.e. advertisements). If a patent were to be issued it seems it would be useful to education rather than the everyday movie viewer. We think there could also be a small market for those who are interested in directing movies. It would allow them to get a feel for what it is like to decide on the final cut of a movie. Overall, the idea is too similar to what is already out there and the few differences it does present only cater to a small market of users.